Controversy Over Chapultepec Forest Use Convenes Congress

The Congress of Mexico City is taking measures to protect Chapultepec Forest from a judicial order that would allow its conversion into residential area. Legislators threaten to challenge the order, advocating for the forest's preservation amidst allegations of governmental mismanagement in the legal defense.


Controversy Over Chapultepec Forest Use Convenes Congress

The Government of Mexico City is facing a legal dilemma regarding the defense of Chapultepec Forest. Various political positions have emerged around this issue, generating debate and discussion in the capital's Congress.

Deputy Ricardo Rubio questioned the legal defense carried out by the Government and raised the possibility that real estate interests may be influencing this situation. He also warned about the consequences of not obeying a court order, recalling previous cases of the dismissal of local authorities for this reason.

For its part, various political parties like the PT and the Green Party have expressed their commitment to defending the people's interests, emphasizing the importance of preserving the city's natural heritage. Measures have been proposed to prevent changes in land use for Chapultepec Forest.

The PAN group has expressed concern over judicial non-compliance and has highlighted the need to respect legality in the process of defending Chapultepec Forest. The coordinator Andrés Atayde stressed the importance of following due legal process in this case.

The coordinator of the Morena group, Xóchitl Bravo, has announced the implementation of legal, judicial, and political actions to protect Chapultepec Forest from any unauthorized modifications. Meetings and informative assemblies have been scheduled to involve the community in the defense of this natural space.

In summary, the Congress of Mexico City is immersed in a debate about the defense of Chapultepec Forest, with divergent positions reflecting the importance of preserving this green lung of the capital. Although opinions differ on the methods of defense, most political forces agree on the necessity to respect and comply with judicial decisions in this case.