Justice in Mexico has been criticized for distancing itself from citizens due to a rigid and elitist legal tradition. It is believed that judges have become disconnected from the reality of the people, and that justice should not be limited to the strict application of the law, but also transform reality when necessary. According to some opinions, the figure of the judge should not have a political character, but rather be an impartial arbitrator solely committed to justice.
In this context, the need to reform the Judiciary in Mexico has been raised, seeking judges with suitable profiles who can administer justice with fairness, social awareness, and institutional responsibility. The importance of judges being aware of technological advances, economic dynamics, and the evolution of rights to perform their duties effectively is emphasized.
Justice in Mexico is perceived as formalistic, slow, and distant from society, with processes that can last for years. There is a call for judges to resolve conflicts considering social transformation, equity, and institutional responsibility. It is recognized that the judicial system requires greater proximity to the social and economic reality of the country to ensure adequate stability.
In response to criticisms of a closed and elitist judicial system, a democratization process has been promoted, seeking greater proximity of judges to society. It is considered essential that judges be elected by popular vote and that their role in interpreting and applying the Constitution for the benefit of citizens be highlighted. The importance of those who perform the function of judging possessing a high technical level and solid ethics to regain society's trust in the judicial system is underscored.
