The reform carried out by Morena in the Mexican judicial system is generating controversy and concern among the population. This reform implies substantial changes in the structure and functioning of the Judiciary, calling into question the independence and impartiality of this branch of the State.
One of the most controversial points of this reform is the election of judges and magistrates through a lottery conducted by the National Electoral Institute (INE), which will not allow direct participation from citizens. Furthermore, judicial electoral circuits have been established that divide the election into 32 circuits, making it difficult to clearly understand the candidates and their profiles.
The lack of transparency in the selection of candidates, as well as the possibility that they may be proposed by Morena structures, raises doubts about the legitimacy and objectivity of these new judges and magistrates. There are concerns that this reform could allow for the influence of party interests or even organized crime in the judicial system, thus undermining trust in the administration of justice in the country.
Additionally, irregularities have been observed throughout the implementation process of this reform, from the lack of evaluation of the candidate profiles to the execution of a lottery instead of a more rigorous selection process. All of this calls into question the legitimacy and legality of the new members of the Judiciary.
This reform has also raised concerns about the impact it may have on the economy and development of the country, as it creates uncertainty and affects investment and economic growth. Furthermore, the viability of this reform to guarantee justice and the rule of law in Mexico is questioned, given that it seems to favor party obedience over judicial independence.
In summary, the judicial system reform promoted by Morena has generated criticism and concern in various sectors of Mexican society, who see this initiative as a threat to the autonomy and impartiality of the Judiciary. In light of these doubts and questions, it remains to be seen what the real consequences of this reform will be on the justice system and the country as a whole.
