In the case of the kidnapping of 'El Mayo', the president of Mexico has set a deadline for the Attorney General of the Republic to respond to the petition related to the incident. An explanation regarding the rights of the accused and clarifications about the circumstances of the kidnapping are expected.
Following the kidnapping of 'El Mayo', some inconsistencies in the previous statements of Rubén Rocha Moya and his prosecution were revealed. In fact, Guzmán López was accused of treason to the homeland. The situation becomes more delicate in light of the threat of possible tariffs.
The relationship between the president and her legal advisors is tested by the letter from 'El Mayo' Zambada requesting guarantees in case of repatriation. The possibility of extraditing Joaquín Jr. is raised, posing a challenge for both the prosecutor and the president.
The presence of the Attorney General at the National Palace has become frequent during the president's term, showing a closeness that stands out amid the current circumstances. The letter from 'El Mayo' adds a complicated element to the bilateral political agenda and the fight against crime.
In this context, it is expected that the prosecutor will present solid findings to support the president's response to 'El Mayo's' request. The background of similar cases, such as that of Álvarez Machain in 1990, highlights the importance of maintaining sovereignty and acting in defense of national law.
