Controversy Over Isabel Miranda de Wallace's Claims

Isabel Miranda de Wallace has sparked debate with her challenge regarding her son’s case. Activism and allegations of evidence simulation have brought her under scrutiny posthumously.


Controversy Over Isabel Miranda de Wallace's Claims

Journalist Ricardo Raphael highlighted in a column in Proceso in 2018 that Isabel Miranda de Wallace, with her activism, managed to connect and receive support from high officials such as then-president Felipe Calderón and Genaro García Luna, his Secretary of Security condemned to 38 years in prison in the U.S.

After the publication of the book 'The False Wallace Case', Isabel Miranda de Wallace issued a challenge: she offered one million pesos to anyone who could deliver her son Hugo Alberto Wallace alive, challenging those who doubted her credibility.

In 2021, the Attorney General's Office opened an investigation against Isabel Miranda de Wallace for simulation of evidence and alleged irregularities during the investigation into her son's murder. The investigation was initiated following a complaint from alleged torture victims.

Isabel Miranda de Wallace was reported by the former president of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, Arturo Zaldívar, and questioned by various media. Journalist Guadalupe Lizárraga cast doubt on the activist's version regarding the case of her son Hugo Alberto Wallace.

Jacobo Tagle Dobin, implicated in the alleged kidnapping of Hugo Alberto Wallace, confessed to his murder. Isabel Miranda de Wallace's story was cast into doubt by various sources, questioning her actions while she was backed by high authorities.

Isabel Miranda de Wallace, founder of Alto al Secuestro, was a well-known figure in the fight against this crime in Mexico. After her death at the age of 73 due to complications from surgery, her legacy continued to generate debate, with accusations of fabrication of evidence and simulation of events to victimize herself.