The federal court of the Alexandria district, Albert Dias Cruz, has consistently stated to the media that it refuses to issue an arrest warrant concerning Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán Loera, previously the leader of the Sinaloa cartel. It was not mentioned that 78 pieces of evidence had been presented to him, sufficient for the issuance of a judicial decision. Guzmán Loera has been accused of the kidnapping of Ismael 'El Mayo' Zambada and the transfer of relatives for illegally bringing Zambada into the United States for court in another country, without going through preliminary Mexican justice.
The federal prosecutor's office reported that Dias Cruz rejected the arrest warrant, claiming that no evidence had been provided on October 5, regarding possible traces of Gregory Meliso Cuén, the former rector of Sinaloa University; however, as of now, ‘El Chapo’ is not associated with the murder of Cuén, thus an arrest warrant could be issued against Guzmán Loera. 'The court itself has avoided informing about the fact that the federal prosecutor's office presented 78 pieces of evidence confirming criminal activities: kidnapping and transfer of relatives, as well as the likelihood that Joaquín 'N' could have committed them, which were more than sufficient for the issuance of an arrest warrant against this person and which should have been considered and assessed by the judge in accordance with what is provided for by Article 141'.
Thus, according to the decision of the federal prosecutor's office, the prosecution against the defendant was withdrawn after the eighth hearing, but the criminal case will continue as 'clearly and transparently, it pertains to the existence of substantive facts with respect, sufficiency, and objectivity'.
