Today marks 100 days since the assumption of the new governments. A moment that invites reflection on the effectiveness of incoming administrations in fulfilling their obligations and creating a historical legacy. It is interesting to ask what merits justify highlighting these first hundred days in news headlines.
It is common to see government members congratulating each other and applauding themselves for achieving this milestone. However, this act of celebration raises questions about the true relevance of such events. Historically, we have witnessed how some political leaders have established the custom of receiving applause as a show of loyalty and submission from their followers.
The cult of personality and the exaltation of the leader as a central figure are not new phenomena in politics. These gestures of self-praise and flattery towards public authorities have been criticized in the past, but they seem to repeat themselves time and again throughout history. The constant quest for recognition and the instrumentalization of power to generate applause and promote a triumphant narrative are practices that persist in various political contexts.
It is important to question the need to applaud rulers as a show of uncritical approval of their management. Loyalty and submission should not be confused with the critical exercise of citizenship in evaluating public policies and the performance of authorities. The celebration of the first hundred days of government should go beyond self-praise and focus on tangible results and concrete benefits for society.
It is essential to maintain a critical and demanding spirit in the face of the exercise of power and not fall into complacency and flattery. Rulers must be held accountable to citizens and work for the public interest, rather than seeking easy applause and personal gratification. Building a just and equitable future requires a real commitment to democracy and transparency, beyond ceremonies and public celebration events.
