The president of Mexico has made clear her convictions, political negotiation skills, and pragmatism in the face of challenging situations for the country. She presents herself as a national leader who is focused, concentrated, and capable of reaction and response. However, under her mandate, the submission to the Executive, the destruction of the institutional apparatus of justice, and the selection of candidates aligned with Morena are being questioned.
"What need did Claudia Sheinbaum have to inflict that last humiliation on the remaining ministers?" they ask. The president is the target of criticism for her persistent position on judicial reform, her disdain for the laws and rights of public servants, and her attitude towards the Supreme Court of Justice. Her figure, on an international level, contrasts with her arrogant and proud stance in the domestic sphere.
Her selfishness and vindictiveness in not inviting some ministers to important events are criticized. It is emphasized that a president represents all Mexicans, not just those who supported her in the elections. Moreover, a minimum of decorum and respect for institutions is requested. The president scorned the Court, becoming the center of a constitutional celebration without including all sectors.
Although her actions in the face of international challenges are recognized, her local behavior and lack of statesmanship are questioned. Her speech at constitutional events, surrounded by Morena members, raises doubts about her capacity to call upon all political sectors. According to critics, the president reproduces undemocratic practices and crushes those who disagree with her stance.
It is highlighted that the Court's attitude has deserved the treatment it receives from the president. Her lack of consideration for other powers and her total submission to the Executive generate controversy. The president enjoys high approval ratings in polls, but faces criticism for her attitude toward institutions and the opposition.
