
The President's decision to appoint Escandón as consul in the United States raises controversy. The appointment of Escandón as consul in Miami, given his past and political connections, has sparked criticism and debate. His previous ties to the governor of the state of Chiapas and his history regarding drug trafficking and organized crime have generated concerns and questions about the appropriateness of his appointment.
Rutilio Escandón, known for his connection to the Obradorist movement and his management as governor of Chiapas, has faced criticism for alleged negligence, omission, and supposed ties to organized crime in the region. His designation as consul in Miami, apparently in gratitude for his support of the political movement, has raised concerns about the legitimacy of this choice.
The complaint filed by Willy Ochoa with the White House, the State Department, and Florida authorities seeks to veto Escandón's consular position. It is argued that Escandón's appointment in Miami could have negative repercussions not only for Mexico's diplomatic representation in the United States but also for the bilateral relations between both countries.
Criticism of this controversial decision has not been long in coming, with Chiapas political figures and analysts pointing out that Escandón's history concerning security and drug trafficking does not make him suitable for such a significant diplomatic position. His noted lack of experience and capability in international affairs deepens doubts about Escandón's suitability to represent Mexico in such a delicate context.
Amid this controversy, criticism of the President for this nomination has been increasing. The perception that an individual with a questionable history in security and organized crime has been favored to occupy a key diplomatic position in the United States raises serious questions about the prudence and political judgment of the Mexican authorities. Ochoa's complaint reflects concerns about the potential negative consequences of this appointment and the implications it could have for the relationship between both countries.