The Complaints and Reports Commission has determined that the minister and candidate being reported has made statements that could be interpreted as electoral propaganda, undermining the academic character of the forums. This commission has evaluated that the expressions made by the minister can be perceived as political campaign strategies rather than contributions to academic debates.
In this sense, it has been concluded that the minister's interventions have diverted attention from the academic topics covered in the forums towards political aspects related to her candidacy. This situation has generated controversy and raised concerns about the use of academic spaces for propaganda purposes during the electoral campaign.
The Complaints and Reports Commission has emphasized the importance of preserving the integrity and purpose of academic forums, urging participants, especially those in public positions, to refrain from using these spaces to promote their personal political interests. It is essential to guarantee a plural and enriching academic debate environment, free from partisan or electoral influences that may bias the objective discussion of the topics presented.
