At the Congress, the parties were frustrated by the lack of dialogue, which led to many political issues being transferred to the judicial venue. The reform was implemented abruptly, without resources or consensus with the INE. If the elections fail, President Sheinbaum will face the consequences.
Two of the main concerns about the reform are the influence of organized crime in the judicial districts and the subordination of the Judiciary to the Executive. Some reject the reform, considering it illegitimate, while others seek to change the rules from the existing legality.
The judicial reform has generated debates and criticisms. Some mention that the intervention of organized crime in elections has evolved, posing an additional challenge. The reform excluded political parties from participating in the election of magistrates.
Some believe that disobeying a Court ruling would be a break from constitutional order. There is debate about whether the reform will solve issues of access to justice and the quality of judicial service. Citizen participation is considered essential to highlight problems of legal injustice.
The figure of the Constitutional Court stands out as a guarantor of constitutional order. The situation highlights the importance of judicial independence and revives debates over the judicialization of politics.
The controversy surrounding the reform generates uncertainty about its impact and the need for broader dialogue. Potential scenarios of breaking the constitutional order and conflicts between state powers are raised. The opposition sees the elections as an opportunity to contest power.
